Frequently Asked Questions
Everything you need to know about participating in Meta-Student. Can't find your answer? Get in touch.
General
What is Meta-Student?
Meta-Student is a platform that pools individual participant-level data from undergraduate and postgraduate research projects into living meta-analyses. Each contributing student earns co-authorship on the resulting peer-reviewed publication (if successfully published). The platform was developed by the Sports Science Replication Centre (SSRC), but is open to researchers and students from any scientific discipline.
Is Meta-Student only for sport and exercise science?
No. Although Meta-Student was developed by the Sports Science Replication Centre, the platform is designed to support collaborative IPD meta-analysis across any scientific discipline — psychology, health sciences, education, biology, nutrition, and beyond. If your study design fits one of the supported protocols (RCT, pre-post, crossover, cross-sectional, or RCT with pre-post measures), you are welcome to propose a study or register to contribute.
Who can participate?
Any student conducting a research project that matches one of the active study protocols can participate, regardless of discipline or institution. You need a supervisor who will approve your registration and verify your data. Both your account and your supervisor's email must be institutional addresses — see below.
Are personal email addresses (Gmail, Outlook, etc.) accepted?
No. A university or institutional email address is required for both student accounts and supervisor approvals. Personal email providers (including Gmail, Outlook, Hotmail, Yahoo, iCloud, etc) are not accepted at any stage. If you do not have an institutional email address, please contact your university IT services. This requirement exists to verify academic affiliation and maintain the integrity of the research record.
Does it cost anything?
No. Meta-Student is free for students, supervisors, and institutions. It is an academic research infrastructure project.
How do I earn co-authorship?
If your dataset passes validation and is included in the final meta-analysis, you are listed as a co-author on the resulting publication. Authorship follows the guidelines set by the project lead and the relevant journal policy. Users are reminded that the academic peer-review process does not guarantee that every study will be published, but we do guarantee that every study will be submitted for peer-review.
Registration & Supervisor Approval
Why is there a 4-week waiting period after registration?
Pre-registration before data collection is a core principle of open science. The 4-week minimum is there to allow time for ethics approval and data collection — it is a floor, not a deadline. You can submit any time after those 4 weeks have elapsed, as long as the study is still open (we will not close a study without contacting any registered students, no-one will be left behind). The gap prevents post-hoc submissions and strengthens the integrity of the meta-analysis. Planning, ethical approval and data collection take time.
What does my supervisor need to do?
Your supervisor receives an email to approve your registration. Upon final submission they also confirm that your project aligns with the study protocol, that you have ethical approval, that your methods are sound and deviations are reported, and they also approve your final data submission. You must provide a university or institutional email address for your supervisor — personal addresses (Gmail, Outlook, etc.) are rejected automatically.
Can I register for multiple studies?
Although we do not recomend this (research is time consuming and requires depth of reading and planning), Yes — you can register for as many studies as you have matching projects for. Each registration is independent and requires separate supervisor approval.
Can students working together on a project both receive authorship credit?
Yes. When registering, the lead student can add co-contributors — providing each person's name, email, and institution. All listed co-contributors will appear in the CONTACTS.csv included in the study report package, and will be acknowledged as co-authors on any resulting publication. Co-contributors can also see the registration on their own dashboard by logging in with the email address used when they were added. Only one student submits the data (the lead registrant), but the contribution is credited to the whole group.
How do I add a co-contributor to my registration?
On Step 2 of the registration wizard (Supervisor Details), scroll down to the "Co-Contributors" section. Enter each co-contributor's full name, email address, and institution, then click "+ Add". You can add as many as needed. Co-contributors do not need to have a Meta-Student account when you register, but if they create one using the same email address they will be able to see the registration on their dashboard.
What if students from the same project want to submit different datasets?
Each dataset submitted to a study must represent independent data collected by a distinct group. If two students collected the data together (same participants, same collection session), that is one dataset and one submission — use the co-contributor feature to share the credit. If students collected entirely separate datasets (different participants, different sessions), each student registers independently and submits their own data file.
Data & Privacy
What data format is required?
You upload a CSV file using the exact template provided at registration (attached to your confirmation email). Each row is one participant. Column names must match the template precisely — do not rename them. The platform analyses the raw individual participant data directly; you do not need to calculate any summary statistics.
What participant consent is required?
Written, explicit informed consent is mandatory from every participant before any data is collected. Consent must cover two things: (1) that their de-identified data will be used as part of the student's university project, and (2) that their de-identified data will be contributed to the Meta-Student collaborative meta-analysis and may be included in a peer-reviewed publication. Both elements must be present in your consent form. Data collected without this dual consent cannot be submitted.
What ethics documentation is required at submission?
Proof of institutional ethics approval is mandatory and must be uploaded at the point of data submission. This must be the official signed ethics approval letter, on institutional headed paper, bearing the signatures of the approving ethics committee or officer. Reference numbers alone, emails, or unsigned documents are not accepted and will result in your submission being rejected.
Will my data be publicly available?
Yes. Meta-Student uses Individual Participant Data (IPD) meta-analysis, and in keeping with open science and FAIR data principles, the de-identified IPD dataset will be made publicly available — on Zenodo or a comparable open repository — upon completion of the project. This is standard practice for open-science research and is a condition of participation. It is why written informed consent from participants must explicitly cover contribution to Meta-Student and potential inclusion in a peer-reviewed publication. During the project, your raw CSV (data file) is accessible only to platform administrators and your supervisor.
What happens if my data has problems?
The platform runs automatic quality checks when you upload: it validates column types, checks for duplicate participant IDs, flags extreme values, and reports group imbalances. If errors are found, you will see a clear report and can fix and re-upload. Warnings (non-blocking) are shown for your information.
Can I update my data after submission?
If your submission is returned for revision (NEEDS_REVISION status), you can re-upload. Once a submission is validated and included in the analysis, it cannot be changed — this protects the integrity of the cumulative results.
Analysis & Results
What statistical method is used?
Meta-Student uses Individual Participant Data (IPD) meta-analysis via linear mixed-effects models (lme4). This is considered the gold standard for meta-analysis because it uses the raw data rather than summary statistics, preserving within-study variation and enabling more robust estimates.
What happens if a study meets its stopping criteria while I am still collecting data?
If you have already registered for a study, you will always have the opportunity to submit your data — regardless of whether the study has met its stopping criteria or been marked as Closed. Stopping criteria signal that sufficient information has been accumulated for a statistical verdict, but they do not cut off registered contributors. A study marked "Closed" means new registrations are no longer accepted, but all existing registered students can still complete and submit their work. No registered student will ever be left behind.
What are the sequential stopping criteria?
Each study is monitored under the v6 stopping rule, which has a burn-in (k ≥ 4 studies) and then three independent triggers: T1 Detection — the standard error of the standardised effect is below SESOI/2 and the pooled effect is significantly different from zero, T2 Conditional-power futility — the projected probability of ever reaching significance falls below the registered CP threshold, T3 Precision futility — the projected k needed to satisfy the precision target exceeds the registered k cap. A trigger only closes a study when the same trigger fires at two consecutive looks (strict 2-consecutive confirmation). The minimum k for any close is therefore 5.
What do the stopping badges mean on the studies page?
"Accumulating" means the study is still ongoing with no v6 trigger confirmed yet. "Effect detected" means the T1 detection trigger fired on two consecutive looks; the pooled effect is precise and significant. "Futile close" means a futility trigger (T2 CP-futility or T3 precision-futility) fired on two consecutive looks; continued accumulation is unlikely to change the verdict given the registered SESOI. A futile close is not a positive null finding; it indicates the study has reached the point where extra data would not be expected to change the conclusion.
What study designs are supported?
Five designs: Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT), Paired Measures / Within-Subjects (PRE_POST), RCT with Pre-Post Measures, Crossover Trial, and Cross-Sectional / Correlational.
For Supervisors & Institutions
How can my institution get involved?
Supervisors can propose new meta-analysis studies via the Propose a Study page, although this prcoess will require substantial buy-in from the proposer to assist in the development and planning of a study beyond simply sharing an idea. Alternatively, they can direct students to register for existing active studies. No institutional agreement is required — individual supervisors can participate directly.
Can I propose a new meta-analysis topic?
Yes. Visit the "Propose a Study" page to submit a proposal. The platform administrators will review it and, if approved, they will be in touch to engagie with you in creating a new active study that students can register for. This process is not undertaken lighlty, and we require careful planning as well as domain expertise for each study.
What if I have concerns about a student's data?
You approve or reject each submission via an email link. If you have concerns, reject the submission with notes — the student will see your feedback and can revise. Administrators also run outlier detection and can flag or exclude problematic datasets.